Page 112 - A Widening Idea of Health and Health Research - The South African Medical Research Council from Creation to COVID
P. 112

Slimmer, but Not Lacking Gray Matter: The MRC, 2012–2021


                  Research

                  Between 2012 and 2021 the foci of the 26 new research units – 6 intramural and
                  20 extramural – established directly by the MRC itself or with its financial backing
                  at universities or research institutions bear testimony to how extensively Karim’s
                  argument had been taken on board by the MRC in the wake of revitalization, viz.
                  that extramural units were more likely than intramural studies to produce top-level,
                  breakthrough research. In his view, surveillance studies, which characterized much of
                  research done by the intramural units, ‘explained the extent of the problem, [but] it
                  does not find new solutions’.
                                           53
                     Apparently equally accepted was his contention that biomedical projects involving
                  laboratory and clinical research would, at that point, probably raise the MRC’s
                  reputation higher internationally than those in the broad field of public health.
                  ‘Sometimes the answer does not lie in public health research’, he maintained, ‘but
                  in some area of basic laboratory research in conjunction with public health research.
                  The MRC’s approach has been more to apply public health methodology than to ask
                  and answer the important questions. We need directly to exploit local strengths and
                  competitive advantages … Simply doing that which is obvious will mean doing what
                  everyone else is doing and failing to have a high impact.’
                                                                   54
                     This meant that, quite unlike the situation in the first two decades after 1994, from
                  2012 new research units with a public health orientation numbered just 5, compared
                  with the 21 new units with a biomedical, clinical or laboratory-based focus.  To
                  encourage ground-breaking research, the MRC continued to oversee them with a light
                  hand. One world-ranked unit director lauded this policy enthusiastically, explaining,
                  ‘The long-term, flexible nature of SAMRC funding made all the difference [to my
                  research] … It’s about giving people relatively unrestricted funding because you trust
                  that they will do good research and, most importantly, use the research to train good
                  people … We have populated local institutions with good people.’ 55
                     This is apparent in the fact that, although 15 of the 19 new extramural units
                  were located at the historically white universities,  3 were based at historically black
                                                             56
                  universities,  largely as a result of significant financial and technical assistance from the
                            57
                  MRC to build up research capacity on those campuses. The list of institutions hosting
                  MRC-supported research units was beginning to widen, but as yet only slowly, as the
                  MRC insisted in public that its brand reputation would be upheld. ‘There will be no
                  compromise on key principles’, it proclaimed, before pragmatically noting, however,
                  that ‘there would be flexibility to assist researchers to refine research proposals to
                  become competitive’.
                                    58


                                                                                         105
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117