Page 49 - A Widening Idea of Health and Health Research - The South African Medical Research Council from Creation to COVID
P. 49

A Widening Idea of Health: The SAMRC from Creation to Covid


               conference and briefing papers, CERSA staff took every opportunity to influence
               policy-makers. ‘The use of researchers at the highest policy-making bodies is very
               important’, Yach insisted, ‘since it is an opportunity to bridge the implementation
               gap in the most direct way.’  He had been able to persuade Council, he declared, that
                                       33
               implementation was ‘a legitimate function of a researcher’. 34
                  The buzz in  what one CERSA researcher  described as the ‘small progressive
               bubble’ that was CERSA  was infectious. ‘We were like kids let loose’, recalled one of
                                     35
               her colleagues. ‘We tried all possible research methods without anyone to say you can’t
               do that or it won’t work. We … were very practically inclined and very keen to use
               methods we had read about … Very early on we developed sophisticated mixed-methods
               approaches for practical research on priority problems with real-world impact.’ 36
                  Despite some opposition from more traditional researchers at the MRC who felt
               that CERSA was suspect in both its approach and its underlying ideology – ‘they
               couldn’t [even] spell epidemiology’, quipped a former CERSA staffer  – its acceptance
                                                                          37
               by Brink, Van Heerden and Prozesky saw it flourish and begin to affect other research
               units. Consequently, in 1992 the MRC actually approved a multidisciplinary National
               Urbanization and Health Research Programme to promote research on the impact
               of urbanization on health across the board. Accurately, the editor of the prestigious
               American  Journal  of  Public  Health  (a  South African  epidemiologist  who had  gone
               into exile because of his opposition to apartheid) observed that CERSA ‘has been the
               spearhead and the leading edge of change within the MRC’. 38
                  Two research directions within CERSA, health systems and chronic diseases
               of lifestyle, were sufficiently topical in a country in the midst of a political and
               epidemiological transition to be formalized as distinct sub-divisions in 1992, but a
               third, tobacco control, became a spiralling crusade led by Yach himself. Tellingly, while
               the MRC had not permitted him to indicate his affiliation to it in his first foray into
               this field in print in 1982,  by 1988 it had changed its tune radically, issuing warnings
                                     39
               against smoking on its ‘Medicina’ campus, publishing articles in the press and in the
               South African Medical Journal on the dangers posed by smoking, and even producing
               ‘Smoking and Health in South Africa: The Need for Action’ as an official CERSA
               technical report. In it, CERSA characteristically spelt out that the report was aimed
               at bridging the gap ‘between research findings and implementation at community
               level’.  Indeed, such was the MRC’s new-found anti-tobacco zeal that when, in 1992,
                    40
               the Minister of Agriculture advised the tobacco industry to ready itself for attacks
               by the anti-smoking lobby, Philip van Heerden publicly reproved him for ‘a highly
               irresponsible statement … [which] should be strongly rejected as it just encouraged
               the industry and smokers’.
                                      41
               42
   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54