Page 72 - A Widening Idea of Health and Health Research - The South African Medical Research Council from Creation to COVID
P. 72

Positively into the New South Africa: The MRC, 1995–2012


                  same time it still often found itself in collision with those holding opposing beliefs
                  about HIV/AIDS and its treatment. For instance, in 2003 Dr Mark Colvin, an MRC
                  researcher who had carried out research for the National Department of Health on the
                  provision of ARVT to pregnant women was barred by that department from explaining
                  his methodology in a paper to the South African AIDS Conference in Durban because
                  providing ARVT was not yet official policy. However, the MRC opposed this unilateral
                  decision and gave its support to the paper’s delivery, which won the author the applause
                  of the audience when he explained this background to them. On the other hand, MRC
                  researchers steeped in Western-style allopathic medicine must have swallowed hard in
                  2004 when, at a gathering at ‘Medicina’ itself, Tshabalala-Msimang lauded traditional
                  African remedies like beetroot, African potatoes, onions, lemons and garlic for the
                  treatment of HIV and enthusiastically announced, ‘We are trying to wean our people
                  off antiretrovirals … I know that a lot of people are using traditional medicines and are
                  getting better.’  Presumably, the R6 million her department provided to the MRC to
                               77
                  investigate the claims by traditional healers that they had found an immune-boosting
                  cure for the disease made her ideas easier to swallow.
                     Certainly Dr Anthony Mbewu executive director of research at the MRC from 1996
                  and Makgoba’s successor-but-one as president from 2004 to 2009, was not unimpressed
                  by the possibility of immune boosting to counter AIDS. This led him to flirt with the
                  idea that vitamin tablets made by the well-heeled German Rath Foundation might be
                  an effective treatment against AIDS instead of AZT, which the Foundation believed
                  was toxic. However, so sharp was the outcry by AIDS doctors and NGOs like the
                  Treatment Action Campaign that this was quackery that Mbewu did not pursue this
                  initiative. A South African Medical Association spokesperson warned him: ‘If you’re
                  the premier medical institution in the country, you have to use discretion in deciding
                  whom you take money from. Who is pulling the purse strings affects the credibility
                  and the results, and in this case it’s a highly, highly, highly questionable source.’
                                                                                           78
                  However, this flirtation proved to be not the last of Mbewu’s ill-judged decisions as
                  president.


                  Research, commercialization and communication
                  If HIV/AIDS loomed larger and larger in the MRC’s research purview in these years,
                  thanks to the Council’s improving financial position this did not come at the cost of
                  research into other areas. Increasingly these were to be determined by their pertinence
                  to actual health problems in South Africa (i.e. applied research) rather than by their
                  purely scientific interest (i.e. basic research). In Prozesky’s words, far less priority


                                                                                          65
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77